Hiring you ans 5
Possible Answer 5:“My manager recently told me that he’s never seen anyone with more advanced Microsoft Office skills than me! But, I would like to admit that I have acquired all my skills on job, from my past experiences, which when implemented at your organization, can bring much value and growth to this esteemed organization. I think the job role being offered will serve my purpose along with the development of the organization.”
Soham Sengupta
Hiring you ans 4
Possible Answer 4:“I feel that I should be hired by you given my excellent academic background along with the skills and experience the company is looking for. I have the experience and the attitude to excel. If given a chance, I will surely work towards building my expertise, which would prove beneficial for me as well as your organization.”
Why should we hire you ans3
Possible Answer 3:“Honestly, I possess all the skills and experience that you’re looking for. I’m pretty confident that I am the best candidate for this job role. It’s not just my background in the past projects, but also my people skills, which will be applicable in this position. On the other hand, I am a self motivated person and I try to exceed my superior’s expectations with high-quality work. Being a fast learner, I quickly pick up business knowledge related to my project. Lastly, I would like to add that I work well both as an individual contributor and also as a team member. Collectively, all these skills put together makes me a complete package for this job.”
Why should we hire you ans2
Possible Answer 2:“This is a wonderful opportunity for me to get interviewed at such a renowned company. Your organization will surely prove to be an excellent platform for me to establish my skills and knowledge in the corporate world. Even though I am a fresher, I assure you that I will give my best and work to my full potential so that I can contribute as much as I can towards the growth and welfare of this great brand.”
Why should we hire you answer 1
Naukri's OffThe HR interview question “Why Should I Hire You” turns out to be tricky no matter how simple it may sound. It may leave you feeling as if you are compared to other candidates but that’s how it is. I always feel that this question entails a list of my qualities that the interviewer wants me to speak out, and THAT makes the situation really awkward!This article aims at sketching out a few customised answers to the question “Why Should I Hire You?”, which would give you a clear idea of how to create an edge for yourself in this one!Possible Answer 1:“Over the years, I have acquired relevant skills and experience, which I shall bring to your organization. I have also worked tirelessly on my communication abilities and teamwork skills, which I will put to use in my future career, which would be in your organization if I am selected for the position. I have given my 100% effort in my past companies, and this has enabled me to recognize my capabilities and limitations. If I channelize them further, they will bring fruitful results to me and also to your esteemed organization.”
Durga puja special status
*শুভ মহালয়া**পুজো আর বাকি মাত্র ৭ দিন । তারপর কদিন মজা হই চই* । আর দুর্গা পুজোর দিন গুলিকে *বিশেষ* করে তুলতে ঢাক রিংটোন বা পুজোর দিনে status দেওয়ার জন্য রইল pujo special status/ringtone...... *শারদীয়া র আগাম শুভেচ্ছা ।**Durga puja special status*:- https://youtu.be/0fddioTQF8Q2. *Sasthi special status*:- https://youtu.be/jcQr7aF58TM3.saptami special status:- https://youtu.be/K2D-ICLmGXg4. *Astami special status*:- https://youtu.be/dvYQqm-bgx85. *Nabami special status*:- https://youtu.be/tJvhUs5k2_k
How to stop environmental crisis
According to the latest UN study, the “ozone holes” (there are actually two: one above each pole) are healing at the rate of 1% to 3% a decade and will have completely vanished in the northern hemisphere by the 2030s and the southern hemisphere by the 2060s. This is cause for back-slapping, but also frustration that the world has not been able to unite as effectively over the climate and biodiversity crises. Here are half a dozen lessons.Imagery and language matterThe satellite animation of the changing atmosphere over the Antarctic first shown in 1985 appeared to show a growing “ozone hole”. This was a scientifically imprecise description of the thinning that was concentrated at both poles, but the metaphor – of the roof over our home planet being punctured – captured the public imagination and, most importantly, conveyed a sense of urgency. By contrast, many people feel distant from climate problems, which are usually illustrated with images of polar bears, filled with caveats and headlined with vague labels, such as “global warming”, which sounds benign (or even desirable for those living in cold countries), and “climate change”, which comes across as a statement of the obvious.Safety first When scientists raised the alarm about chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) gases, there was initially uncertainty about their impact on the atmosphere and the process, but the risks from sunlight weakly filtered by the ozone layer (cancer, crop failure, ocean ecosystem collapse) were so great that world leaders decided not to wait. Instead, they applied the “precautionary principle”: “If in doubt, cut it out.” Even before the science was settled, they started to act. This was also supposed to be the case with the climate, but lobbying to deny the validity of the science, particularly in the US, has stymied action.Speed countsGovernments temporarily put aside cold-war hostilities and united rapidly around a solution to the ozone problem. From the first research in 1973, it took just 16 years for the world to discuss, agree and put in place a solution that reversed the trend. By comparison, scientific warnings that carbon dioxide emissions could disrupt the climate date back to at least 1962 (and the risks were speculated on much earlier). Yet despite numerous international agreements on the subject since then (Rio 1992, Kyoto 1998, Copenhagen 2009, Paris 2015), emissions are still climbing.Leaders should leadIn the 80s, the environment was not yet the polarising issue it has become, but the dominant figures – including the US president, George HW Bush, the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, and the British prime minister, Margaret Thatcher – still had to overcome business interests, treasury doubts and political short-termism to protect the future health of the planet. They refused to accept the delaying tactics of chemical companies, some of which argued action should wait until the science was clearer. Today, Trump, Bolsonaro and the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, represent fossil fuel interests, deny science and undermine international cooperation.The burden must be sharedThe phased ban on CFCs and dozens of other ozone-depleting gases was an economic blow to chemical firms, refrigerator producers and aerosol-spray manufacturers. Rich countries dealt with the job losses, technology upgrades and other economic consequences internally, but also provided support for poorer nations to manage the transition. From 1991 to 2005, pledges totalled $3.1bn. Similar arrangements exist for climate accords, but the sums need to be far higher because the actions are so much more expensive, the responsibility of industrialised nations is so much greater, and the impact on poor countries is incalculably worse.If it’s worth doing, it’s worth improvingThe Montreal protocol has been updated numerous times as the science has sharpened and new climate goals have been incorporated. This month, the Kigali amendment added a plan to cut hydrofluorocarbons by more than 80% over the next 30 years, which would reduce global heating by 0.4C by the end of the century. Under the Paris climate agreement, governments are supposed to ratchet up the ambition of their pledges to cut emissions, but most governments are failing to meet even their current inadequate targets.AdvertisementLooking at this list, a millennial might be tempted to conclude that the Montreal protocol was possible because it came about in a golden age when leaders were smarter, politicians more representative and populations more amenable to scientific persuasion. But, as anyone alive in 1989 knows, that is far too simple an explanation. The reality is that environmental action was easier then because the world had more ecological breathing room, capitalism was less dominant and the corporate push-back – and control over politics – was weaker. The ozone layer was a relatively simple fix compared with the climate, which is the biggest, most complex, multidimensional challenge humanity has ever faced. It is one thing confronting a handful of chemical firms, quite another to take on the world’s fossil fuel companies, car manufacturers, cement-makers and agribusiness conglomerates, representing hundreds of millions of jobs, trillions of dollars and 200-odd years of industrial development.Bush, Thatcher, Gorbachev and the then Chinese leader, Deng Xiaoping, knew this in 1989, when global temperatures were already rising at an unnaturally rapid rate. A year earlier, in a US congressional testimony reported throughout the world, the then Nasa scientist Jim Hansen had declared “with 99% confidence” that this heating was a result of human activity. They also knew the problem would be easier to solve then than 30 years in the future. Initially, Bush promised to lead a determined global response to climate change, but – as the short-term costs of a long-term solution became apparent – he balked. Instead of a comprehensive response, he merely strengthened research, paved the way for a drawn-out global negotiating process and complacently put his faith in future innovation and entrepreneurship.He may well have reassured himself that his environmental legacy was secure, thanks to action on ozone. But the climate can that he and others kicked forward 30 years ago is still clanking through the corridors of global conferences. It is a lot rustier now, but still basically the same half-response to a problem that becomes bigger and harder to solve with every year that passes.So this year’s anniversary of the implementation of the Montreal protocol should not just inspire nostalgia for 1989, but a curse on the first generation of leaders to dodge climate responsibility. And as we are already suffering the consequences of their failure, it should remind us that every day of delay has a massive and imminent cost. Each fraction of a degree of global heating that can be prevented will save lives, species and money.In our lifetimes, the ozone hole will be closed in the stratosphere while the increasingly angry beast of climate rages below. How angry is up to us. Montreal reminds us that nothing in politics is inevitable, that profits do not have to come before people, that global problems can have global solutions, that we can shape our own future. That depends on how far we are willing to push. In 1989, that wasn’t far enough. Nor has it been since. In 2003, the UN secretary-general, Kofi Annan, called the Montreal protocol “perhaps the single most successful international agreement to date”. Sadly, that still applies today.
Voter card verification
নির্বাচন কমিশন ১লা সেপ্টেম্বর থেকে নির্বাচকের তথ্য যাচাই করণ প্রক্রিয়া শুরু করেছে। এই প্রক্রিয়া চলবে আগামী মাসের ১৫ তারিখ অর্থাৎ ১৫ই অক্টোবর পর্যন্ত। এই প্রক্রিয়াটি সম্পন্ন করতে পারবেন যে কেউ বাড়িতে বসেই নিজের স্মার্টফোন থেকে। এর জন্য আপনাকে ডাউনলোড করতে হবে কেবলমাত্র একটি মোবাইল অ্যাপ। যা ভারতীয় ইলেকশন কমিশন ইতিমধ্যেই গুগল প্লে স্টোরে আপলোড করে রেখেছে।সেজন্য আপনাকে প্রথমে গুগল প্লে স্টোরে যেতে হবে, সেখানে ‘Voter Helpline’ নামে একটি মোবাইল অ্যাপ রয়েছে যেটি ডাউনলোড করতে হবে। ডাউনলোড করার সময় অবশ্যই দেখে নিবেন অ্যাপটি নির্বাচন কমিশন দ্বারা প্রদত্ত কিনা, অন্য কোন সংস্থার দ্বারা আপলোড হয়ে থাকলে সেটি ডাউনলোড করবেন না। কারণ তাতে আপনি প্রতারণা সম্মুখীন হতে পারেন। আর যদি কারোর এই অ্যাপটি আগে থেকেই ডাউনলোড করা থাকে তাহলে অবশ্যই আপডেট করে নিন।
Origin of name Kolkata
Calcutta is an Anglicized version of the Bengali name Kalikata. According to some, 'Kalikata' is derived from the Bengali word Kalikshetra, which means Ground of Kali (the goddess)However, according to Britannica, some say that the name of the city is derived from the location of its original settlement on the bank of a canal (khal)According to the third opinion, the city's name was originated from the Bengali words -- lime (calcium oxide; kali) and burnt shell (kata), since the area was noted for the manufacture of shell lime